|
|
Carpet Specifications in Assisted Living:
|
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
| The Roller Caster Chair Test assesses delamination and edge ravel performance by mimicking a specific traffic condition and simulating the action of a person seated in a caster chair rolling back and forth and moving around. | |
![]() |
|
| The Appearance Retention Test simulates aggressive walking action through the Hexagon Drum Test. | |
To make the test as rigorous as possible, an unsealed seam is cut in each sample prior to testing. In addition, each sample is installed over a defined cushion, which dramatically increases flexing at the seams, the most vulnerable point. The flexing action, coupled with 198 pounds (90 kilograms) weighting and 25,000 cycles of the caster chair, imparts highly accelerated fatiguing of the carpet, seams and backing. No edge ravel or delamination after 25,000 cycles is the primary criterion evaluated on test samples. Products that can successfully withstand this grueling test usually demonstrate outstanding field performance. Poor results help identify potential problems before carpet goes to the field. The foundation of information established by this test has led to continuing use of this performance specification approach, while discontinuing tests of "untrafficked" carpet samples.
Appearance Retention Test
In a similar approach, the Appearance Retention test (CRI Test TM-101) follows a defined accelerated fatigue process developed through studies conducted by the Performance Standards Committee at the CRI. Carpet samples undergo accelerated fatiguing using, for example, a Hexapod Drum test that simulates the most aggressive parts of the walking action.
The appearance retention of the sample is assessed after 4,000 cycles, and then again after 12,000 cycles according to a defined protocol. Digital photo grading scales help ensure consistency between graders or laboratories. The results confirm how well the composite of carpet face construction and backing system characteristics will maintain appearance retention performance in traffic conditions.
Odors
Undesired odors can be a common concern in assisted-living environments. The increased likelihood of spills, whether from dropped food or drink or bodily fluids, requires certain characteristics in the floor covering to avoid odor buildup. Proper maintenance is an essential component in dealing with prevention of odor, but even best practices cannot compensate for deficiencies in interior products.
Perhaps the most important carpet characteristic for odor prevention is a functional moisture barrier. A subtle but significant distinction exists in the effectiveness of the barrier. This distinction is largely dependent on the barrier’s position in the carpet composite. In the best case, the barrier is positioned at the level of the pre-coat layer, so spills are kept at or above the primary fabric. This provides greater assurance of complete removal of the spill by standard maintenance procedures. Alternatively, in the case of a barrier at the bottom of the carpet, or between the carpet and the subfloor, spills can penetrate through the barrier level, where the liquid may spread out. This can lead to greater difficulty in both initial detection and complete removal. Regardless of position in the carpet composite, a functional barrier will serve to protect the subfloor.
Although the goal is to clean all spills immediately after an occurrence, this target is not always met. Therefore it is important to maintain the spill above the primary fabric to give the best chance for complete removal when the cleaning procedure is conducted.
![]() |
|
| In the best case, the barrier is positioned at the level of the primary fabric, keeping spills Above the primary fabric and allowing complete removal by standard maintenance procedures. | |
Although this test is a reasonable representation of the barrier characteristics of a new carpet, it lacks the ability to predict barrier characteristics over the life of the carpet. Evaluations for improved barrier tests that incorporate the effect of "working" the carpet are underway by the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC), but such efforts take a significant amount of time to complete. One logical approach currently being investigated is to combine the use of the Roller Caster Chair Test with the British Spill Test, traffic the carpet for 25,000 cycles and then conduct the spill test. With this approach, the carpet should be installed with a direct glue approach as defined by CRI Installation Guidelines, CRI 104-96. Successful demonstration of barrier properties on new carpet and trafficked carpet provides a high level of confidence to the product specifier.
Measure It. Manage It.
Combining the Roller Caster Chair, the CRI Appearance Retention Test, and the British Spill Test gives a solid basis for performance specifications in the healthcare arena. This trio provides an assessment of the carpet face and backing under conditions that are much more meaningful than new carpet properties. You can put performance testing to work by making it a requirement in your specifications.
The role of the specifier and facility manager becomes broader at every turn, demanding optimal use of available time for each segment of the job. An important premise, "If you can measure it meaningfully, you can manage it," is at the heart of performance specifications. Based on tests that relate to the performance of carpet in the real world, performance specifications are the measure and control of successful choices in carpet usage.
For more information about Dow’s polyurethane carpet backing products, please call 1-800-847-4212. Reprinted with permission of FacilityCare. Copyright 2000 by Douglas Publications, Inc., Richmond, VA. All rights reserved.
®™* Trademark of The Dow Chemical Company ("Dow") or an affiliated company of Dow